Where's the News?
As I could have predicted, the corporate mainstream media is falling all over themselves to congratulate Sarah Palin on her speech. The well known truth is that Palin's speech has galvanized the conservative base. The media is not and most likely will not ask the tough questions like…
--Why does Sarah Palin continue to lie unchallenged by the media about her support of the “Bridge to Nowhere?”
--Why did Wasilla rarely received few any earmarks before Palin became mayor? She actively sought federal funds and hired a lobbyist with close ties to Sen. Ted Stevens (R-Alaska), who made funneling money to Alaska his hallmark.
--Why did Sarah Palin not walk out of her church when just two weeks ago, she sat there while her pastor gave a anti-Jewish sermon?
--While the McCain campaign has stressed her command of the National Guard – Why has Sarah Palin has never issued a single order to them?
--How do the American people sit with Palin’s claims that American soldiers have been sent to Iraq "on a task that is from God?"
--Why is Sarah Palin involved with AIP? Several days ago the chair of the AIP, a secessionist party, said that Palin attending the 1994 convention. “she was there.”
From www.mediamatters.org:
Neither ABC nor CBS aired analysis from Democrats, Democratic strategists, or progressive media figures during their live coverage of the second day of the Republican National Convention on September 2 (the first day of the networks' live coverage of the convention). By contrast, both networks aired analysis from Republicans and conservatives, as well as from Democrats and progressives, during coverage of the second day of the Democratic National Convention on August 26.








Yeah...the Media is conservative.....
ROTFLMAO
Our mama beats your Obama
- Email this page
By IlluminatiHottieSeptember 4, 2008 - 12:48pmAhh, my ignorant and arrogant snottie has come back to
display her inadequacies to the world. Answer this: If the media is so liberal, then why did they relentlessly attack Clinton over Whitewater and Lewinsky, while doing nothing about the demonstrated unconstitutional acts committed by the Bush administration, such as wireless wiretapping? Why the big deal about Clinton's marital infidelity, but an almost fawning approach to the Bush administration's runup to the war in Iraq, being so gullible or meek that they didn't even bother to check and see if any of the justifications or assertions put forth were actually true?
The "liberal media" game is just that, a game, and it worked to perfection last night. By painting the media as run and controlled by liberals, it cowed them into heaping effusive praise for Palin's speech, which, while strong, was nowhere near the rapturous level they gave it.
Keep rolling on the floor and laughing. I've been doing that ever since Palin was selected, and she is the gift that keeps on giving.
- Email this page
By UffdaguySeptember 4, 2008 - 1:54pmYeah, the guy who obviously has no job....
is projecting his inadequacies on me.... They covered clinton because it was sleazy and disgusting. People watched it because of that and they sold lots of commercial time. Bush hasn't broken any laws unless you want to criminalize policy differences. Which of course you do. The democrats have not done a damn thing but investigate Bush for two years and they've got nothing. Meanwhile gas had more than doubled. Heck of a job Harry!
"When in danger, when in doubt...run in circles....scream and shout".
How the democrats plan to deal with the fact that the Republican VP selection has more executive exprience than their Presidential nominee
- Email this page
By IlluminatiHottieSeptember 4, 2008 - 2:06pmLet me put this in terms that even your tiny little lizard brain
may comprehend. Not only do I have a job, I almost certainly outearn you, and beat you in every category your shrivelled little heart finds dear. By the only things you find to be the measure of a person, money, property, etc., you fall short, so your assertion that I "obviously have no job" is as hilarious and incorrect as your assertions on practically every subject you post your drivel about.
Bush didn't break laws? Then why did he admit that he broke the FISA law on wireless wiretaps, and then worked tirelessly to have it made retroactively legal? Damn, you get dumber every day. Must be all that Faux Noise and Limpballs you consume.
- Email this page
By UffdaguySeptember 4, 2008 - 3:36pmDidn't break laws
then they should welcome investigation and open their records to prove themselves innocent. Right? Isn't that what you were saying about Clinton all through the 80s. Come on, You don't have to worry about a BJ, Bush probably can't get it up.
Except maybe for Jeff Gannon,,, or was that Karl?
- Email this page
By gt6September 4, 2008 - 4:07pmBush lied
Bush lied to get us into a war that was never needed, that is called treason and should be treated as such.Bush's administration outed a covert CIA Agent. That is illegal, and I remember distincly him saying that if anyone in his admin had anything to do with it that they would be fired, instead they got pardoned after the conviction. Perhaps not illegal but treason just the same, and lastly I don't think you could be much of a hottie because your'e not very bright.
- Email this page
By greenguy21September 5, 2008 - 6:50amRove is not an idiot
Here's my take on Palin: Rove is not an idiot. McCain puts her in the VP slot, knowing about all her baggage, then after a couple of weeks she's removed.
The right screams "sexism" and blames the Dems. McCain gets who he (and Rove) wants for VP, and ammunition about the heartless, sexist and anti-family Dems.
Just a thought.
- Email this page
By sfbarbaraSeptember 4, 2008 - 12:52pmAint underbellies fun? Thom's got the beef, the root of the EVIL
Spinning wheels keep on turning, yet the crux of the matter is self-evident as per:
http://airamerica.com/node/84727/477029#comment-477029
- Email this page
By Lt Danny VelinskiSeptember 4, 2008 - 2:19pm∑ Ballot Rigging + Arsenic ♀ Palin ≈ Cleopatra VII Philopator ?¿
- Email this page
By Lt Danny VelinskiSeptember 4, 2008 - 6:42pmOk...you're talking about the conservative media
that for 3 freaking days tried to bury Sarah Palin. Are you people really that stupid or, do you just assume your base is that stupid? They're trying to save face, idiot. They got they're asses handed to them last night. A woman came down from Alaska last night and bitch slapped the holy hell out of them.
"When in danger, when in doubt...run in circles....scream and shout".
How the democrats plan to deal with the fact that the Republican VP selection has more executive exprience than their Presidential nominee
- Email this page
By IlluminatiHottieSeptember 4, 2008 - 1:05pmAs usual you are delusional
There is one word that best describes ill-hottie and that is DELUSIONAL!!!!
- Email this page
By nobush3peatSeptember 4, 2008 - 1:32pmThe media did their job for the RNC
The negatives on Sarah Palin they reported on are all the personal issues she was prepared to answer to and nothing substantive like her record of pork barrel spending, tax raising, and corruption.
They let her get away with saying she was against the bridge to nowhere, when in fact, she worked hard FOR IT.
- Email this page
By gt6September 4, 2008 - 2:54pmWhen in danger, repubs talk
When in danger, repubs talk about standing up to "big government" and shaking up Washington ...Washington that has being in their control for eight years now.
Vote for us because we will stand up to the "boogie man" ... who also happens to be us.
- Email this page
By yngskywlkrSeptember 4, 2008 - 3:55pmInvading Iraq over 9-11 was like
if George Bush came over to you and punched you in your wallet and then you, not being able to find George Bush, went over to Arnold Swarzenegger's House and blew it up, burnt it down to the ground with him in it then wouldnt leave. And when asked by Arnold, who's all crispy and limbless why you hadnt left yet, you said,"Dont worry, Im keeping out the Cheneys.".
Palin is a way of lowering the intellegence level of the arguement again. Just like -No Child Left Behind lowering the over-all intellegence of American students so they're more easily mis-lead by slogan loaded theocratical ideological advertising campaigns. No experience, and thats why they chose her. And its because saying Obama had no experience, was blown away by 2 years of solid campaigning in a trial by fire primary, and then him wrangling the world leaders on his last away trip on top of that which really worried the Republican brass. So their only other option was to go "Totally no experience all Heart-String Pulling BS". This way they can try to reafirm attacks they wish to make against Obama for so-called in-experience by saying we cant attack her for her in-experience, without having to admit Obama is somehow in-experienced in an equal way. It's flimsy.
Riggs Murtough--,"Thin"-"No shit thats thin"-"See through"-"I tell you what that's pretty fuckin thin right there"-"Anorexic"
- Email this page
By MadgardnerSeptember 4, 2008 - 1:35pmNews ?
Here’s your news – Palin’s hair-doo is not nearly as expensive as "Barbie-Doll" Biden’s with his ridiculous hair plugs.
(Biden's plugs look like they were taken from his ass)
All’s hair in love and politics
http://news.bostonherald.com/news/2008/view.bg?articleid=1116858&srvc=20...
- Email this page
By its_so_overSeptember 4, 2008 - 1:28pmIn Buddhism-The Middle Way
The poor-Republicans-nursing on the nipple of the provisional teaching that does not permit all to attain supreme happiness-the goal of religion should be to become happy-to foster the growth and unlimited potential of all-the world is a complex place-we all know this-but there is one all important governing law-call it God, the Force, whatever-we all know deep in our hearts it exists-we comprimise our truest sense of purpose by acquiescing to something-"ominipotent" but as Nelson Mendala said: "It is not our darkness that we are most frigthened of it is our greatest potential to far exceed the realm of a "God" that we can be great unto our selves and each other-is the forgotten divinity-Sarah Palin is the emblem of a people lost-it is sad for them and us all-we must do whatever but embrace them-get out the vote-dialogue and pray however you can to see the divine in all sentinent beings-thats you all, folks! Thank you Thom Hartmann for an amazing show, an incredible voice (literally) and for asking the tough questions...let the Republicans take over again-it will suck but maybe we need to see the implosion...Also, in closing, War is the last abomination...the taking of human life...not an unborn life...but a life...living and breathing NOW...the taking of that life in an act of agression is the greatest degradation of our existence. Bringing about death, letting it occur is the utlimate misdeed...no politician, no king, no priest, no one can purport that it is ever justified-Peace is so much harder to acheive but this inner battle towards ones own human revolution is the imperative of the human spirit to create peace within ones own life to experience it without....No matter how you look at it...your environment is a reflection of you and your responsibility...take responsibility for a fair and just election...then whatever happens you can knwo you did your best!
- Email this page
By marqueeshajonesSeptember 4, 2008 - 1:31pmThank you for that marqueeshajones!!!!
Thank you, well stated and so true and beautiful!
Maybe it would be best to let the publican's take further take our country to the bottom. Maybe people will be forced to look at what their ignorance yields.
- Email this page
By nobush3peatSeptember 4, 2008 - 1:42pmEditing needed
--Why did Wasilla rarely received few any earmarks before Palin became mayor? She actively sought federal funds and hired a lobbyist with close ties to Sen. Ted Stevens (R-Alaska), who made funneling money to Alaska his hallmark.
Thom, thanks for all your good work. You may want to edit the paragraph from your blog posting above.
- Email this page
By James DwyerSeptember 4, 2008 - 1:48pmMcCain chooses Lipstick
Johnny boy, ever the politician, has decided to slap some lipstick on his PIG (Party of Ignorance and Greed). She brings plenty of baggage which I am sure he hopes the public will be entertained by rather than paying attention to the real issues facing our world. Johnny is aiming for the Povich / Jerry Springer audience. I am so NOT impressed!!!
- Email this page
By nobush3peatSeptember 4, 2008 - 4:14pmEnergizing conservative base
McCain Supporter: Wasn't enthusiastic about McCain, was still going to vote for him anyway. But after Sarah Palin last night, am still voting for McCain but now feel "energized" about it.
... Logic anyone ?
- Email this page
By yngskywlkrSeptember 4, 2008 - 4:30pmMoose Burgers/God and Breeding in the Fresh Alaskan Air
Follow your rainbow honey...all the way to the land of Hee Haw and gun totin' bikini clad-Mk-47 White Chicks in Winnebago's and Moose Burger eating Breeders who pray-to an Omnipotent-Burning Bush which tells them wrong from wrong-and who think Iraq is in the Caribbean-Go to your base and Vote for Grampy McSame and Sarah's Paling-get galvanized and energized sweetie-don't forget to take your can of " Civil Liberties and Human Rights Be Gone" in case you might get bitten by a lefty lawyer from the ACLU...or gee willikers...a democrat
- Email this page
By marqueeshajonesSeptember 4, 2008 - 9:20pmThe value of recognizing the code of propaganda
Story one-- people in the media with our best interests in mind are selflessly and nobly searching for truth by extended and deep inquiry into fundamental issues. However, they are incompetent or coincidentally inept, don't recognize that they are succumbing to illogical incongruent and almost incomprehensible talking points. They are liberal. They are main stream.
Story two-- rich and powerful people realized that they could maintain control and power by creating a media emeshed with business and government to reduce the public discourse to opinion and gossip and then control those thoughts with repitition, intimidation, ridicule, fallacies and false arguments. Black is white, white is black, and it is all "propaganda".
Why does it matter that we call it what it is? Because the labels we give things attach meaning. Americans believe in a fair fight. So lets say two candidates climb into a boxing ring, lets call them John and Barack. The bell rings, and Barack swings, but just as he does, the referee pulls out a bat and whacks him in the head. He staggers and the John kicks him in the groin. When Barack covers up, the referee takes the bat and cracks him in the knees. Every time Barack starts to swing the referee hits him with the bat, so that soon he is flinching.
Is the problem that Barack is not a good boxer who keeps missing and flinching, is the problem that the referee isn't doing a good job....
Or is this a mugging and until we stop calling the man with the bat a referee we won't stop it.
- Email this page
By NicoloMSeptember 4, 2008 - 9:04pm"Community organizer" will become a dirty word. . .
if we let it. We let "liberal" become a dirty word because we didn't oppose it when the Rush Limbaughs started trashing it. We seem to be pushing back on attack of community organizing. Sarah Palin would be a disenfranchised indentured servant of her husband if it weren't for community organizers called suffragettes.
Sarah Palin is from the corporate media. Her first job out of college was as a TV sports reporter. Don't think that the sports department is so separate from the political wing. Keith Olbermann started in sports. It's funny that someone from the media is attacking the media. But, then again, she was appointed by a torture victim who supports America's use of torture, and someone who was involved in using the filibuster more than any Senate ever has and then talks about the "do-nothing" Congress.
To be fair, it wasn't Sarah Palin's pastor who made the anti-Semitic remarks, it was a guest speaker. This is even more troubling because you never know when your pastor is going to suddenly lurch off the rails, but when you've got such a blatantly anti-Semitic speaker come in as a guest, you should not go that day!
- Email this page
By macFanDaveSeptember 5, 2008 - 9:26amSHOCK & AWE: THE NEW WAVE
Tuesday, September 9, 2008
As intriguing as is the dirt storm swirling around Sarah Palin, we must now realize that we are very foolish to waste time continuing to dig into it. Let’s not forget that she is not the one we will be voting to elect or defeat as president. Neither will we even be voting for or against John McCain as a personality. This election is about whether we will seize the moment to shake up the power structure that has wrecked this country and brought us to the brink of catastrophe in every imaginable way.
To vote Republican in this election is to vote for a continuation of the status quo. If you are satisfied with the way things have been going for the last eight years vote Republican. Things can only get worse.
The two names at the top of the ticket are just caricatures, figureheads, the tip of an iceberg. These two individuals, dressed anew and labeled as “tenacious mavericks,” “agents of change,” or whatever may seem to fit the moment and undercut the opposition, they only represent the deeply entrenched powers that be who have, in fact, dressed Palin and McCain in their proverbial sheep’s clothing.
However McCain & Palin are being packaged and sold to the voting public, they will owe their offices and their lives to shrewd and unscrupulous GOP powerbrokers and profiteers who have no intention taking any loss on their huge investments in the political power structure that they control.
We are not voting for personalities here. It’s not a matter of who you could imagine having a beer with. While some might have been chugging pints with Georgie boy in their dreams over the last eight years, look where the designated drivers in the GOP leadership have driven this country: to the brink of catastrophe. Is this the road we want to keep following? Are those backseat drivers, drunk with power, the ones we still want calling the shots?
The choice of Palin was clearly not John McCain’s. In his last ditch effort to win the position he’s felt entitled to for over ten years, a position that would complete his life story and secure his legacy for future generations, why would this seasoned politician take such a risk as choosing a polarizing figure he had only met once in his life.
With his about-faces on the issues that once may have once justified the “maverick” label, McCain has obviously sold his soul for a chance to satisfy a personal lust to sit in the Oval Office before he dies. Like G.W. Bush, McCain is nothing more than a willing puppet, dancing to the tune of those entrenched, unelected powers behind the scenes who have promised to fulfill his dreams of personal aggrandizement if he just plays along.
The awesomely shrewd GOP operatives were in no way unaware of all the scandals and the effect their choice could have on the campaign. Remember their “Shock and Awe” campaign? Sarah Palin was chosen to throw a new last-ditch shock wave that is achieving just the amount of awe that they intended.
With November 4th looming just eight weeks from today let’s not play into their calculated risk lest we succumb to this new wave of Shock and Awe that followed this wildly outrageous VP nominee they threw at us. It is just a ploy to divide and conquer their opposition and, sadly, it seems to be working.
Alfalafool in Philly
- Email this page
By tfaigleSeptember 9, 2008 - 9:08amvoter fraud
I'm puzzled why I don't hear much on the radio, tv, or newspapers about voter fraud.
If our votes don't count, then all the debates about McCain, Sara Palin, campaign lies, etc. are all meaningless.
Last night, I saw a screening of the documentary "Uncounted" in Silver Spring MD.
The documentary "Uncounted" offers compelling evidence that our elections are being consistently stolen since 2000. We have no reason to believe this 2008 election will not also be stolen if we citizens don't take unprecedented action to insure all votes count. Mainstream media, which is collectively owned by a mere 5 corporations aren't covering this topic.
You can see a preview or order the dvd from www.uncountedthemovie.com. Please talk more to raise the awareness of this serious issue and review how each one of us has a responsibility to do what we can to insure everyones vote counts.
Sincerely,
Barbara, Silver Spring, MD
- Email this page
By Barbara SchoeberlSeptember 10, 2008 - 11:32amElection fraud
is a frequent subject of discussion on Thom's show.
another must read on the subject is Bobby Kennedy's article in Rolling Stone.http://www.rollingstone.com/news/story/10432334/was_the_2004_election_stolen/print
- Email this page
By gt6September 10, 2008 - 11:39am