Obama Needs FDR-Style Public Works Projects

Henry Paulson has changed his mind three times about how he intends to give away $700 billion worth of taxpayer money. However, one thing is clear about Paulson’s bailout mentality, and that is that he has no common ground with most of the people who are coughing up the money to save American capitalism.
By the time Paulson left Goldman-Sachs, he had raked in more than $350 million in compensation. He was paid that money, I suppose, for exposing Goldman-Sachs to $25 billion in toxic trash loans. Paulson today has a net worth of around $700 million. No failure goes unrewarded on Wall Street.
There is a fraternity-like mentality that exists among corporate CEOs who live in that rarefied air of multimillion dollar bonuses. There is an illusory standard of what “moral” or “legitimate” actually means in decision making for that elite crowd. It is that adjustable scale of decency and morality that has bankrupted America. For two more months, Paulson is the gatekeeper for whether bottom-feeders like Hank Greenberg from AIG or Frank Raines from Freddy Mac get a free pass to squander your taxpayer money the same way they squandered billions of dollars of their shareholders’ money. It is becoming clearer every day that Big Government is not the nitwit entity Americans can no longer trust. It is the Wall Street-Paulson crowd that has earned that label.
One of Obama’s first acts as President should be to change the corporate greed culture that the Bush crowd has built in the last eight years. One way to do that is outrageously simple; If taxpayers bail out a company like AIG, then government helps manage AIG. The alternative is to let the corporate failures fail and then rebuild America by moving those billions into the hands of Americans who will create new roads, airports, and schools.
In 1932, Franklin Roosevelt saved America not by giving money to the corrupt fraternity of robber barons who created the Great Depression. Instead, he moved money onto Main Street. The Works Progress Administration (WPA) moved America out of the robber-baron dark years by building roads, bridges, schools, levees and parks. Again in 1962, the Accelerated Public Works Act invested money into public infrastructure that in turn saved a failing economy and created sustainable jobs for taxpayers.
Conservatives love to object when a single mother of four gets a welfare check, but you can bet that money is spent in grocery stores where jobs are created. FDR understood that the WPA moved money the same way.
For example, when government pays money to rebuild an energy grid that can move energy from wind farms in California to homes in New York, the dollars that are spent create job opportunities in areas of construction, technology, manufacturing and sales. FDR was accused of being a socialist for doing exactly what Obama needs to do today. When Obama turns his back on Wall Street for a while and spends taxpayer money on Main Street, conservatives will label him the same way they labeled FDR. But America today has too much at stake for Obama to worry at all about dull-brained name-calling.
- FILED UNDER: Host Posts, Bailout, Barack Obama, Economy, FDR, henry paulson, Mike Papantonio, pap attack, public works, Recession, roosevelt
- November 20, 2008








That should present no challenge
Start with working on rebuilding national infrastructure. Make sure events like the I-35W bridge collapse never happen again. Make improvements where needed, like widening and raising the causeway out to Port Fourchon, LA.
Go from there.
If all else fails, immortality can always be assured by spectacular error. ~~~John Kenneth Galbraith
- Email this page
By nonexistent manNovember 20, 2008 - 3:52pmFDR-style projects.
This is exactly what I have been thinking. It does no good to bail out the auto industry or anyone else if people STILL don't have jobs to buy cars, pay mortgages, etc. Living-wage jobs with benefits are the answer. I also think that for any company/industry who wants help, a requirement should be that they cut the salaries (and hidden deals like stock options) of all of their top-paid employees to the salary of the US President. Paulsen showed his true colors by giving billions to a company like AIG who pays their executives obscene amounts of money and who shows gratitude by continuing to spend OUR money on lavish trainings. Somehow, most of us in this country are able to learn our jobs without being jetted away to lavish resorts or locations for training. Former long-time US Rep Martin Sabo tried for years to get a salary cap on the company execs, but there was too much opposition and too many lobbyists from big business!
In Minnesota, we bailed out NW Airlines in the past. They have repaid this kindness by cutting jobs and cutting salaries of the hard-working REAL workers, while continuing to shower excessive salaries on the top executives. They are now repaying Minnesota by joining w/ Delta and leaving MN. So much for thanks and agreements.
We need the CCC and the other FDR programs to get people back to work!
- Email this page
By mplsmnNovember 20, 2008 - 6:26pmA recent study determined
A recent study determined that FDR's programs extended the Great Depression by 7 years.
"The fact that the Depression dragged on for years convinced generations of economists and policy-makers that capitalism could not be trusted to recover from depressions and that significant government intervention was required to achieve good outcomes," Cole said. "Ironically, our work shows that the recovery would have been very rapid had the government not intervened."
http://newsroom.ucla.edu/portal/ucla/FDR-s-Policies-Prolonged-Depression...
- Email this page
By jumpingjackflashNovember 20, 2008 - 7:25pmFDR's programs kept americans working....
.....when you're talking 30% unemployment drastic measures are needed. I don't think folks understand just how bad it was back then...
Anyway, I don't think the programs got us out of the great depression...WW2 and our exports to the brits ect prior to our entry....get's most of the credit there in my book. FDR's programs were a critical tourniquet if you will.
- Email this page
By SgtDNovember 20, 2008 - 7:34pmBy SgtDNovember 20, 2008 - 7:34pm
These jokers complaining about FDR turn on the TV and scream at the Waltons: "get a job".
- Email this page
By f u bush2November 20, 2008 - 7:36pmMy Grandma has told me stories...
...she slept in the same bed as her 2 sisters....no heat (in Iowa) froze her butt off. 1 dress for school ect....list goes on. Not much to eat....
What we're going through (now) pails in comparison to the great depression. FDR and his programs stemmed the bleeding.....I know there are alot of old timers that were damned greatfull for the public works projects ect.
- Email this page
By SgtDNovember 20, 2008 - 7:56pmBy SgtD November 20, 2008 - 7:56pm
Not only would it help put money into the pockets of those who would actually spend it, but in the process it would fix things that have been long neglected (highways, bridges, schools, public safety, public transportation, greener living retro-fits, etc), and it would strenghten the tax revenues, which would be a start to get our Country out of debt. A new WPA is exactly what we need. "Trickle down economics" has been a disaster!
- Email this page
By roadgoddessNovember 20, 2008 - 9:55pmI agree with everyhting except paying down the debt...
...the WPA would be funded with Tax money and Tax revenue it would generate would be a lot less than we put in....still think it's needed.
We're going to be stuck with deficits for a while I'm afraid.
- Email this page
By SgtDNovember 21, 2008 - 11:47amIt really depends on how the
It really depends on how the government spends the money. In the short term we would spend more than tax revenue generated, but building and improving infrastructure would generate more tax revenue over time. Our highway systems are a good example of this. If our leadership creates jobs and spends money with the idea of investing in infrastructure, manufacturing and long term living wage jobs for the bottom 95% of the population we could come out of this in pretty good shape. People with money to spend would generate small business growth, more tax revenues, etc... We could call it trickle up economics. We could let the rich have our crumbs for a change.
Let's impeach the president for lying-Neil Young
- Email this page
By bill-clinton69November 21, 2008 - 3:06pmAnd the fact that the U.S.A. had no serious economic rivals
after the Second World War lead directly to the huge boom cycle that lasted nearly 40 years.
- Email this page
By thaelmann37November 21, 2008 - 5:41amBy jumpingjackflashNovember 20, 2008 - 7:25pm
Are these the same economists that endorsed McCain after he said he was clueless on economics and proclaimed that the "fundamentals are sound".
You wouldn't by any chance happen to know what the hell McCain was talking about do you? What fundamentals? Did he mean the mortgages on his 7 or 8 houses are paid off?
- Email this page
By f u bush2November 20, 2008 - 7:35pmThat paper can hardly be
That paper can hardly be called a study, even if it's written by so-called experts. It's an opinion piece. 300 experts said the economy was sound...and two months later, we're in the crapper.
- Email this page
By MichtouNovember 20, 2008 - 8:33pmGod only knows
how much sooner we could have recovered from The Great Depression had our unemployment reached, let's say, 50 or 60 percent, and poverty, let's say, 50%.
Nothing would help us recover from a Depression better that exacerbating the citizens' lack of consumer purchasing power even worse than it was when we fell into The Great Depression.
My guess is this group of guys is the precursor to the same folks that brought us neocon economics and our looming Second Great Depression.
It's much easier to rebound from economic catastrophe when you sit on your ass like Hoover did.
- Email this page
By AntillectualNovember 21, 2008 - 3:34amRevisionist Right Wing Myths won't defeat humanity
You're an idiot. "Recent Study" my ass. That comes from the Institute of the right wing's anus. The further we get from that time, the fewer people alive who remember it, and the easier it will be to fool Americans with revisionist history such as your quote here. Passing along our collective memory as families and as a nation about that difficult time will be our weapon against corporate fascist myths such as the one propegated in this post about "prolonging" the depression. It is true that had enough people died as a result of the depression, then yes we would have probably come out of it due to a shortage of labor and thus an increase in wages for the survivors would result. That doesn't make Hoover's approach better than FDR's. You see, we have humans to consider, not just hypothetical market theories. Wake up! My family will never forget what we went through, and FDR's heroic action when we needed it, and neither should you.
- Email this page
By sandbotheNovember 21, 2008 - 8:42amSince infrastructure has been basically neglected for the last
30 years or more, there is certainly plenty that needs to be done. Roads, bridges, power grids, housing and more need serious attention now, and by making this a government sponsored public works project, we can accomplish a lot in a shorter amount of time, while putting a lot of Americans back to work, and strengthening our nation as a whole. I'd much rather see that $700 billion go to work on infrastructure than giving it to companies and execs whose greed drove their companies into the ground. The money is better spent on Joe the Plumber than Joe the hedge fund manager.
Truth is whatever you can get other people to believe - Tom Smothers
- Email this page
By UffdaguyNovember 20, 2008 - 4:07pmAgreed
The corporatists in the Republican and Democratic parties have devastated our manufacturing base and earning potential by adorning themselves with legalized bribery and making one anti-American decision after the other, each of which were stacked against labor in this country.
These same anti-American assholes have allowed China and other nations to play us badly into bad trade agreements/deficits just so their sources of legalized bribery funds would make more profit so they could get bigger bribes for themselves.
Now the same dicklick motherfuckers tell us the jobs they sold us out on will never return.
We have no option but to create FDR-like work programs, because the same cocksuckers won't reform their fucking legalized bribery scheme because they are profitting well.
You hit the nail on the head once again Papster. I was rooting for you to be the next attorney general so we could get some fucking accountability, but so much for that.
I am waiting for one Democrat in Congress to show they are actually progressive, but aside from Kusinich, they don't exist. Let's hope Obama is the real deal.
p.s. Sorry about using words like "the" and "aside", but sometimes i just get worked up when my representatives represent noone other than their own interests.
- Email this page
By AntillectualNovember 20, 2008 - 4:38pmThe best part of FDR-Style Public Works Projects
Watching Rush Limpbug's head explode.
- Email this page
By f u bush2November 20, 2008 - 7:32pmOn the lighter side of things
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wzyT9-9lUyE
- Email this page
By AntillectualNovember 20, 2008 - 7:38pmBy AntillectualNovember 20, 2008 - 7:38pm
LMAO
How did they do that? It really looks like them.
Check this one out:
vicky pollard dance off
- Email this page
By f u bush2November 20, 2008 - 8:20pmBy f u bush2 November 20, 2008 - 8:20pm
Check this one out:
vicky pollard dance off
--------------------------------------------------------------
That kind of reminds me of this:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ADkQVJz6wuY
- Email this page
By ExpatinEUNovember 21, 2008 - 9:09amCIA Misled Congress, Justice Dept. Over 2001 Incident
- Email this page
By f u bush2November 20, 2008 - 9:06pmLets use the 700 billion to
Lets use the 700 billion to "publically" control the "basic staples" food supply. Agri-Corp is a future cash predator already pouncing ....Food is too important and too easy to cultivate, that farmers have been paid "not to" grow.
"Free food for all" is not a pipe dream, but a nightmare for scheming profiteers.
- Email this page
By aaazzz111November 21, 2008 - 4:23amFrank Reines worked for Fannie Mae not Freddie Mac.
I agree with the article but you lose credability by little mistakes like this.
- Email this page
By PaulednieNovember 21, 2008 - 11:06am