Upcoming

- Weekdays - 6pm
- Sunday - 2pm
- Monday - 6pm

TODAY'S SHOW: THURSDAY AUGUST 2ND 2007

By krislopresto
Bridge

Today's show is going to be a little different.  We are going to spend the entire first hour talking about the Minneapolis bridge that collapsed last night.  This issue-- public safety and American infrastructure-- is one that Rachel has been particularly dedicated to and one that seems to get lost in the aftermath of tragic episodes such as this.  But not here.

So today we are going to the experts-- the people we feel are three of the best advocates for improving the infrastructure of this country, the people who know how important it is that America not merely be able to forcefully attack, but also be able to take a punch when hurricanes and terrorist attacks and the like occur.

Rachel will be talking with Rick Perlstein, a senior fellow at the Campaign for America's Future.  You may remember him from a few weeks ago when we talked to him about the steam pipe explosion in Manhattan.

And then Rachel will be joined by Stephen Flynn, the Jeane J. Kirkpatrick Senior Fellow for National Security Studies at the Council on Foreign Relations and the author of the book "Edge of Disaster: Rebuilding a Resilient Nation"

And then in the second hour of the show we will talk to Nick Coleman, a columnist at the Minneapolis Star Tribune, who has written a passionate, scathing column today on what happened to his city yesterday and why we should all be outraged.

MENTIONED ON TODAY'S SHOW

The Republican Party's lawyer in California has proposed a ballot initiative that posed the biggest hurdle we've seen yet to getting a Democrat in the White House

New Al Qaeda Ad-- wait, what?  It's an ad?

Another amnesiac from the White House testified before the Senate Judiciary Committee.  Leahy was having none of it

The FDA has cut its safety inspections by 47% in the last three years, but one department that didn't suffer cutbacks?  The department of quadrupling cash bonuses to top officials

Two parties operating as two pockets of the same pair of pants

It is as if the political enemies of the republican administration might also be serving as his ally against the American people.

Kucinich’s bill, H. Res. 333, has 14 co-signers and is currently stuck in the House Judiciary Committee, chaired by Civil Rights icon, John Conyers.

Conyers, who claimed to be on the side of impeachment a year ago, is ironically the sole authority preventing the impeachment bill from heading to the floor of the House for a full vote. House Speaker, Nancy Pelosi, indicated on the same day the bill was introduced that it would never see the light of day.

Two powerful Democrats decry the abuses of power of the White House, while simultaneously suppressing the opportunity for the people’s representatives to vote on impeaching the executive branch leadership they whine about.

Congress could immediately call an end to the war in Iraq and demand the withdrawal of all troops from the Middle East. The president is merely the Commander-in-Chief, not the dictator. He doesn’t even have sole authority to declare war. That license is reserved for Congress. Yet, Congress refuses to exercise its power. It merely complains.

Congress could refuse to fund the war. That would force the president to withdraw his troops. He could, of course, require them to remain where they are and place them in jeopardy without needed materiel reinforcements and supplies. But Congress could also remove the president and vice president and then remove the troops.

Instead, Congress, which presumably represents the people, is comprised of quite a deceptive group of underlings serving the executive branch.

While all eyes and polls are on the president, the prissy Pelosi and the cunning Clinton in Congress are standing on the sidelines cheering as the façade of political enmity with Bush maintains the attention of the American people.

Neither the Democrats nor the Republicans represent the will of the American people, which poll after poll indicates overwhelmingly that we want an immediate withdrawal from the Middle East, come what may.

Additionally, we want a real, honest, thorough investigation of 9/11 by an independent authority with zero connections to the White House. Such an investigation ought to include the many legitimate scholars and experts (which include military, aviators, air traffic controllers, special ops, ex-CIA, etc) across the country who bring to the table a feast of evidence to be considered along with a veritable flood of questions that remain unanswered to this day.

America is at a critical juncture. As we approach a presidential election year, we have seen the executive branch speed up its efforts to solidify a permanent U.S. military presence in Iraq and Afghanistan. We have seen the sabers rattling, targeting both Iran and Pakistan. We have seen the augmentation and expansion of presidential authority and executive privilege. We have seen the new creations of authority, including the latest National Continuity Coordinator.

We are now witnessing ongoing nationwide experiments, such as “Operation Noble Resolve,� that are supposed to ensure our safety in the case of a major terrorist attack.

America has been warned of a potential “false flag� operation to be conducted on our soil by our government in order to garner support for an attack on Iran. That warning came from Zbigniew Brzezinski in a testimony to the Senate Foreign Relations Committee on Feb. 1, 2007. Millions of Americans are convinced that 9/11 was just such an event, ushering in unprecedented support for unilateral executive authority to abuse our military.

Today, we see the signs of two parties operating as two pockets of the same pair of political pants, walking all over the constitution and the will of the American people.

http://blogcritics.org/archives/2007/08/02/084752.php