The Fairness Doctrine Takedown
On a Wednesday, a progressive think tank and non-profit together release a report. For about a week, conservative commentators on-air and online make the most of a fresh chance to tear apart a public policy approach they generally despise. Then on the following Thursday, the House of Representatives votes overwhelmingly to block all federal funding for any implementation of any flavor of said policy. Game, set, match, and not bad for a week's work.
You'll remember that the Center for American Progress and Free Press released a report last week that once again raised the idea of the Fairness Doctrine, the telecom principle that in effect until the Reagan Administration that said that the public airwaves had to be used to promote a diversity of opinions. To dig into the details of the policy, that meant that radio spectrum licensees were required to address controversial issues and broadcast contrasting viewpoints. Also, anyone who was the target of an on-air personal attack had to be given the chance to clear his or her good name on-air.
Conservatives tend to hate the Fairness Doctrine, preferring an approach that says that in the free market of ideas, the thinking most appealing to the public would and should win out. To be fair, there are a great many liberal/progressives/lefties/whatever who dislike the Fairness Doctrine too, generally arguing on free speech grounds.
What began last week as a healthy discussion about the lack of diversity on political talk radio quickly devolved into round 3,482 of the great Fairness Doctrine debate. The conservative blogosphere went full bore on it, having a great time raising the Fairness Doctrine balloon and shooting it down, over and over again. And then yesterday the House of Representatives rushed en masse to vote for an amendment to an appropriations bill offered by Indiana's Mike Pence (himself a former radio guy) that would prevent the FCC from using one federal cent to implement the Fairness Doctrine or anything that smells like the Fairness Doctrine. The final vote was 309-115. Again, not too shabby for a week's work.
- FILED UNDER: Editor Posts
- June 29, 2007








Fair Doctrine should not be the issue.
In The Progress Report which came out shortly after the report was released they stated that:
" Progressives, including several members of Congress, have unfortunately allowed the right wing to control the debate on this issue, focusing their legislative attempts at reinstating the Fairness Doctrine, a federal regulation that was repealed in 1987, required broadcasters to devote airtime to important and controversial issues and to provide contrasting views on these issues in some form. Reinstating that doctrine is not the answer. With talk radio being one of the most widely used media formats in the country and reaching an estimated 50 million listeners each week, it is imperative that progressives reclaim the debate from the right wing and instead address the increased concentration of talk radio ownership that has occurred over the past decade. As report co-author John Halpin stated, "If we break up concentrated ownership, and encourage greater local accountability over radio licensing, and still end up with lots of conservative talk, then so be it. We don't think this will happen but at least the playing field would have been made more level."
It looks as thought we are still concentrating on the wrong issue, just as the right wishes.
- parent
By gbreezJune 29, 2007 - 2:01pm