Upcoming

- Weekdays - 1am
- Weekdays - 9am
- Sunday - 6am
- Saturday - 1am
- Monday - 1am
- Monday - 9am

Memo To Jesse Jackson: Shhh!

By Lionel

Oh, no. Jesse Jackson's speaking in public about Obama. In a foreign country. The much-loathed France, no less. In the birthplace of criminally expensive water Evian (you know the joke, Naive spelled backwards), Jesse's telling folks that under an Obama administration things will be different, The New York Post's Amir Taheri reports.  Oh, no.  Let me be blunt, Reverend, you are the personification of polarization: the polestar, the paragon.  With 20 days to go before history is to be made, on the eve of the final debate, what in God's name possessed you to spout anything in "support" of Barack Obama. 

In speaking before the World Policy Forum, the Reverend suggested that in an Obama administration, fundamental changes will happen and anent the Middle East, "decades of putting Israel's interest first" would come to an abrupt halt.  Oh, it gets better.  Taheri reports that Jackson believes that although "Zionists who have controlled American policy for decades" remain strong, they would certainly lose a significant degree of clout and influence in an Obama adminsitartion. Stop.  Cease and desist.  From the man who wanted to perform a makeshift orchiectomy on Barack after having spoken too much about black paternal irresponsibility, now this.  If, most respectfully, Reverend Jackson, you truly want to do what is palmary for Obama, despite your disclaimers that you're not a member of the campaign or a spokesman and that Barack is "family," his son and daughter both close to Barack and Michelle, stay home and button up.  With all due respect.

Again, with twenty days left and commentators abuzz and McCain supporters still reeling over comments from John Lewis juxtaposing McCain and George Wallace (what?!), this in no wise helps anyone.  And, while we're at it, calling Reverend Al Sharpton, with all due respect, lay low.  This is nothing racist in intent.  Both sides know that the most polarizing factions should take a vaction until November 5th.  That goes for evangelical whackos (Exhibit A: Reverend [What's with these reverends?] James Dobson, Tony Perkins et al.), gay marriage advocates and/or any group that polarizes, distracts and diverts attention.

There are fewer issues more, again that word, polarizing than the Middle East and Israel.  Florida looks strong for Obama; he's ahead of Mr. Potter.  Florida has a dense population of retired Jews whose allegiance to Israel is, well, obvious.  Jackson's rhetoric, especially as it concerns "Zionists," scares the bejesus (is that possible?) out of a lot of folks, Jewish and otherwise.  So, I respectfully ask, whom is he trying to appeal to?  There is no need to incite anyone or group or to cause the issue door to open the slightest thus allowing McCain to storm through with irrelevant, incendiary issues a la Steve Schmidt.

Twenty days.  Twenty days.

Comments

(7)

Oh no he di-ent.

.

Jesse, Jesse, Jesse.

You are so upset with being passed over and headed out the door, you want to destroy Obama's chances of being president. You are that jealous? That vindictive? That spiteful?

What did Obama ever do to you?

Hopefully, he didn't say this shit on camera. It could cost Obama the election.

That last time he opened his mouth, his son publicly blasted him. And then his daughter blasted both father and son for being, well, so public. I suspect this time his son AND his daughter will blast him.

Isn't it enough that you continue to call yourself a Reverend when you are out having illicit sex and making babies?

Just STFU!!! Please!!!!

Censorship is not American

Lionel, you have no backbone when you ask everyone to shut up. It is the right of any American to speak up, as Keith Olberman did last night in his special comment about congressman John Lewis's statements. Why can't you say something like that? Instead, you attempted to censor Lewis's statement, as John McCain did, because of inability or timidity. Get a spine. It is obvious that Obama is black, and to tell people that we shouldn't say that is denial. Talk about it intelligently, as Barack did in his race speech in Philly. Don't cover it up with "shush." The elephant in the room is much to large for you to say it doesn't exist. Acknowledge it, expose the racism, and then we may be able move on as a species.

There is a difference between censorship and "big mouth".

I think that Jesse just wants to sink Obama's chance at being president. He's jealous, pure and simple.
Comments like this are manna for the McCain/Palin campaign.
If Jackson said these things on camera, they will show up in an anti-Obama ad. You watch.

The Dixie Chicks were censored as well

and then they were vindicated. Why can't we have a discussion about race in this country? You can judge Jackson's comments as jealous or whatever, but everyone has a right to their opinion. This is America Godammit!

That is not an opinion.

I read the New Your Post article. If Jackson wants to give his opinion, fine, but what he actually said was, "This is what Obama's position will be".

That is putting words in someone elses mouth.

Not once did Jackson say, "This is what Obama told me personally". Everything was speculation but prefaced by, "This is what an Obama Administration will do". '
And then he went on with this "rant" about the Jews controlling the country.

I'm all for free speech and giving an opinion. This was not a question of free speech. The was "misrepresentation" pure and simple.

Let's not confuse the right

Let's not confuse the right to have an opinion with the wisdom about when and how to to express it.

Jesse was very critical of Obama during the primaries

Now he speaks approvingly about what he thinks Obama's positions will be..

My opinion of Jesse has always been this: He is a great organizer of people for marches and protests. He is at his best when it comes to getting people to recognize a problem.

However, once the problem is recognized and it's time to implement new policy or change, I think Jackson is out of his element. It's one thing to recognize a problem and another to implement changes and new ideas.

What I'm saying is no different than recognizing people's strengths and weaknesses at work or in sports. Someone might be a great offensive coordinator in the NFL but a horrible head coach.

Going back to Jackson's strengths, I should also say he is a good negotiator. Both parties have used him in diplomatic efforts. The same skills that make him a good organizer of people also make him a good diplomat.

Comments

(7)