McCain Willing to Risk Nation’s Security In Order to Win an Election
As Ian Fried aptly observes, John McCain has selected a running mate who is two years removed from running a town with fewer than 10,000 residents. Sarah Palin has zero experience in foreign affairs, has been governor for a year and a half, and is just 12 years removed from the Wasilla City Council. This is simply not a serious pick, but it fits perfectly into McCain’s approach to running a presidential campaign.
Barack Obama deftly skewered McCain last night by pointing out that he makes “a big election about small things.” That’s a good way to describe a campaign that runs commercials featuring Paris Hilton and Britney Spears. It is the height of irony for McCain to have claimed that Obama will do anything to win the presidency: in fact, that ought to be the McCain campaign’s slogan: “anything to win”. McCain has changed his position on everything from the Bush tax cuts to offshore drilling and the religious right. Was it Howard Dean who recently observed that the McCain of 2000 wouldn’t vote for the McCain of 2008? Whoever said it, it is on the money.
McCain has said that we are in the fight of our life against Islamic terrorism, that the stakes have never been higher, but he chose someone who is clearly not the most qualified candidate to be his running mate. Does he really expect Americans to believe that Palin would be the best person to deal with Iraq, Afghanistan, Pakistan, North Korea, Russia, the health care crisis, and the economy, should the circumstances require? Is Palin the person best capable of keeping the country safe, if she is required to take the reins. Of course not–it would probably be difficult even to find many Republicans willing to argue this. This choice is not about governing, it’s not about picking the best qualified candidate. It’s about smoke and mirrors, somehow trying to convince women that they ought to vote for McCain because he has a woman on his ticket, no matter what her qualifications or her views, trying to place a shiny object in front of the media that will distract them from a gaffe-free, brilliantly executed Democratic national convention. To say that McCain’s approach is condescending barely scratches the surface.
McCain’s campaign is premised on his love of country, his supposed ability to put country first. But how could someone who really puts America first be willing to take the chance that the nation’s security will be in the hands of someone who, just two years ago, was responsible for managing a small town?
McCain’s selection of Palin is about one thing, and one thing only: a calculation that the selection will help him win an election. I believe and hope that calculation is wrong, but the fact that McCain made this decision, the mos important decision a presidential candidate can make, so cavalierly, so crassly, tells us more about McCain than anything else we knew before.
- Original article
- FILED UNDER: Guest Blogger
- August 29, 2008








Thank you so much for making the case against Obama
who of course has even less experience than Palin. Obama is less than 12 years removed from being a "community organizer" Keep it up guys.
- Email this page
By IlluminatiHottieAugust 29, 2008 - 4:41pmOK lets make that comparison
Palin has a year and a half as governor of a state with a population like an average county in NJ. before that she was a part time mayor for 4 years in a podunk town of 5000.
Obama has been a US senator for 4 years. before that he was in the illinois legislature for seven. Even when he was a "community organizer, he was also teaching constitutional law as he did for 12 years. You really don't need to go there.
- Email this page
By gt6August 29, 2008 - 5:22pmOh yes, let's do go there.
Obama has 0 accomplishments. Zero.
- Email this page
By IlluminatiHottieAugust 29, 2008 - 6:26pmYou Forgot Editor Of Harvard Law Review...
... hottie.
- Email this page
By othelloAugust 29, 2008 - 7:17pmBy IlluminatiHottieAugust 29, 2008 - 7:26pm
LOL
Either you are clueless or you enjoy lying.
- Email this page
By f u bush2August 29, 2008 - 10:53pmYou're right
He didn't accomplish the deaths of over 130 sailors like Jukebox Johnny McWetStart. And he's not the subject of two criminal investigations like Palin.
Sounds like an excellent start for Obama.
If all else fails, immortality can always be assured by spectacular error. ~~~John Kenneth Galbraith
- Email this page
By nonexistent manAugust 30, 2008 - 1:32amHow do you define accomplishment?
.
As opposed to John McCain's endless list of accomplishments:
Keating Five
Suncore
40,000 High Tech Jobs and a 100 billion dollar contract to EADS
More than a dozen votes against benefits for OUR soldiers who are fighting wars on two fronts
Walking around a Baghdad market surrounded by more than 100 of our sons and daughters who he was using as human body shields for a photo op (good judgment there)
Saved many times from embarrassing gaffs by "Whispering Joe"
Has supported a war to "liberate" a country that has since written "Islam" into their constitution as the National Religion and has decimated their Christian population by HALF since 2004.
A man who believes the war against al Qaeda is in Iraq.
A man who has used the "POW" card over and over again to shield himself from scandal.
Even before he began a string of Senate scandals, his personal accomplishments are staggering,
Graduated 5th from the Bottom from the Naval Academy
A string of sleazy sexual affairs while married to a woman disfigured in a car accident
Married his mistress less than a month after his divorce became final
Lived with his wife until the divorce bacame final
Personally destroyed 5 jets
Forrestal
Has a temper so violent, even in High School was known as "McNasty".
Republicans are so blinded by their hatred of Democtrats and a qualified black man going into the White House, they would see this awful person as president. Talk about "cut off your nose to spite your face".
No matter how many of Obama's accomplishments are pointed out and what an idiot McCain (and has proven himself to be over and over again) is, Republicans will never get passed the color of Obama's skin.
- Email this page
By deanrddAugust 30, 2008 - 2:32pmBy IlluminatiHottieAugust 29, 2008 - 7:26pm
The falseness of that statement needs no illumination.
- Email this page
By Dr_BillionaireAugust 31, 2008 - 9:32amYeah, Let's....
Four years is a bit of a stretch, don't you think? It's more like three and a half years in the senate and if you subtract the time he has spent away from his job campaigning for president, it's probably a little less than two. During that time, he has the second most liberal voting record and overall he has Zero executive experience. Oddly enough, due to his inexperience he went against his campaign slogan of Change and picked a longtime Washington insider to be his running mate.
Our nation has a proclivity to elect governors as presidents and in the past 50 years only three US Senators have been elected--Nixon being the most recent. And if experience as a Senator is your benchmark, than I guess McCain is far more qualified for the job.
Obama's (in)experience as a freshman Senator may impress you and other true-believer socialists, but statistically speaking most Americans don't believe the presidency should be OJT.
- Email this page
By USNavyVetAugust 30, 2008 - 12:28amSo maybe a navy pilot (and a failed one at that)
who:
-may have collaborated with the viet cong
-crashed 5 times
-WAS a member of the Keating 5 (the folks that gave us the S&l crisis of the late 80/early 90's)
-wants to privatize Social Security and Medicare
-is WIDELY known for his explosive temper
-wants to continue and further the tax cuts to the hyper rich
-wants the oil companies (bastards to the last one) to be allowed to drill offshore
-hasn't said much about conservation/alternative energy
-seems to be looking for WWIII
this is better than Obama???
Put down the pipe, and move away from the rambo movie with slow and deliberate motion...
give me lever, and a place to stand...
- Email this page
By wrenchboyAugust 30, 2008 - 1:20amBy USNavyVetAugust 30, 2008 - 1:28am
I have said the same thing numerous times and I was pissed when the democratic party put congress critters up as frontrunners for the nomination. As it turns out this statistic doesn't matter because BOTH candidates are senators.
- Email this page
By f u bush2August 30, 2008 - 9:26amHeaven
Lets put aside that bush has sent , Navy ships into the black sea, which by a touch of a button ,would be destroyed by Russia. Having said that, what do you think Heaven will be socialist,capitalism, or a democracy?
- Email this page
By getmad54August 30, 2008 - 4:07pmgiven the bible's
negative take on usury, laziness, allowing others to starve, etc...
I figure heaven is most likely a huge hippie commune.
Praise Jesus and his dad... and pass that number over here!
give me lever, and a place to stand...
- Email this page
By wrenchboyAugust 30, 2008 - 4:18pmWHY ARE REPUBLICANS SO DISHONEST?
.
Just being in office doesn't make you qualified. Why do Republicans refuse to discuss McCain's many scandals? They are there for everyone to see.
Is it simply because he has lived this long he deserves to be president? I know that at least 12 nominees were younger than Obama and Lincoln had far less experience.
Obama has shown his leadership just by the fact that he put together a very good campaign and has taken the high road each time, defeating "much more experienced" politicos along the way. And, he is respected all over the world. People are afraid of McCain. McCain is simply too unstable.
If Obama played by McCain's rules, he would be saying McCain put his election ahead of the welfare of the United States. Sound familiar?
- Email this page
By deanrddAugust 30, 2008 - 9:12pmBy IlluminatiHottieAugust 29, 2008 - 5:41pm
You've always been so smart. Given that, could you bring me fully up to speed on the details of her strong ethics stand(s) in Alaska? I've heard something about a resignation but not much more.
- Email this page
By Dr_BillionaireAugust 31, 2008 - 9:30amSeriously?
You think a mayor of a small town and short term Governor compares to 8 years in state and federal government? What are you smoking?
- Email this page
By SaveourcountryAugust 29, 2008 - 5:13pmExactly!
Sounds like the shrubs experience.
btw whatever you are smokin', pass it over!
- Email this page
By justintymeAugust 29, 2008 - 6:00pmummm
I'm not sure I'd want a turn at that substance...
Look what it did to the repugnicans!
give me lever, and a place to stand...
- Email this page
By wrenchboyAugust 29, 2008 - 6:26pmOhhhhh, so Obama voted for 8 years.
I've been voting for 8 years too. He's never run anything. He's your choice because his crew was good at manipulating the caucus system. You blew it.
- Email this page
By IlluminatiHottieAugust 29, 2008 - 6:29pmWell, neofascists, you have beaten that talking point to death.
You seriously think a woman who hasn't even been governor for a year and doesn't believe in evolution is presidential material?
Wow.
- Email this page
By thaelmann37August 30, 2008 - 9:41amTo them.
her time as governor is practically immaterial. They believe she is qualified BECAUSE she belives in evolution. Ideology is everything.
- Email this page
By gt6August 30, 2008 - 9:46amLet's not forget
...who her hubby works for. Can there be any serious doubt that she's in the pocket of Big Oil, even deeper than Cowboy-hat Oathbreaker?
If all else fails, immortality can always be assured by spectacular error. ~~~John Kenneth Galbraith
- Email this page
By nonexistent manAugust 30, 2008 - 1:21pmEnough with the experience,
it's the details that matter. What previous experience did Roosevelt have for running a world war ?
Four of the last five presidents came from a governor's mansion. How long had any of them been governor and who had held any other government office?
Compared to Clinton's "experience" why didn't Kennedy get nominated in 1992?
- Email this page
By richaduAugust 29, 2008 - 6:01pmWhy did The Supreme Court
appoint that lying fucked-up wastrel president in 2000 over the vastly more experienced Al Gore?
Why did anyone vote for Bushshit instead of another legislative lifer John Kerry in 2004?
G.O.P. - bunch of chickenshit hypocritical assholes
- Email this page
By alienuslxAugust 30, 2008 - 4:34pmPalin was likely NOT first choice
After the BRILLIANT convention we (Dems) threw, you can only imagine the amount of McCant's phone calls that were answered with 'Thanks, but no thanks' when offering the veep to the real heavyweights - the ones that realize that their political future won't be be worth squat after they get their ass handed to them this election.
My guess is that anyone who really could have palyed as veep told them to pound sand, as they would like to have apolitical career left when this is all over - Palin is just window dressing - a trophy veep to go with his botox trophy wife.
All I had to do in order to scare the S&*T out of myself, would be to imagine her sitting across the table from Medvedev, discussing the situation in South Ossetia, after McCancer's latest bout with melanoma.
- Email this page
By mythreadboxAugust 29, 2008 - 9:32pmIt's kind of weird...
Watching so many democrats stop retreating, stop apologizing, and stand to face the aggressors.
It sort of answers that old question about what if the buffalo turned and faced the lions.
If Palin and Mccain get into the white house, be fifteen miles away from major cities, and have an electric car.
give me lever, and a place to stand...
- Email this page
By wrenchboyAugust 30, 2008 - 5:15pmSnottie says Obama has no accomplishments.
Apparently she hasn't been paying attention.
This guy has leadership ability and organizational skills like nothing anyone alive has ever seen in American politics.
Obama has energized the American electorate, bringing MILLIONS of new voters into the system.
His campaign has been incredibly masterful, navigating through rocky waters, nosing out the greatest political machine in history by understanding, WITH A CLARITY OF VISION, not just the political mood, BUT THE REALITY OF MODERN DEMOGRAPHICS AND COMMUNICATIONS TECHNOLOGY.
=======================
The guy's a fucking genius.
WHO'S GONNA GET US OUT OF THIS MESS, SNOTTIE???
The doddering, prickly, ill-tempered, flip-flopping panderer who graduated 894 out of 895?? (I mean JESUS CHRIST, you talk about a dim-witted slacker!)...and his moose-eating, beauty-queen pin-up, creationist baby machine from Bumfuck Alaska??
NO THANKS.
I'll take the Magna Cum Laude, President of the Law Review, from Harvard WHO HAS ORCHESTRATED THE GREATEST CAMPAIGN IN MODERN HISTORY.
- Email this page
By A GAugust 30, 2008 - 3:50pmWHISPERING JOE IS A BLABBERMOUTH
They put out an extended version of McCain staring at Sarah's girlfriends.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nOVc9djQUFk&feature=related
It's a hoot.
Don't tell Cindy.
This is why John is for insurance paying for Viagra. Whispering Joe whispered that "it is a medical condition". We could all use a little "stiffening".
Birth control is a "lifestyle" choice.
You know, this is going to bring back the discussion of "mysticism" in public schools as an "alternative" science.
I know for a fact that Sarah goes to a real "medical" doctor.
The foundation science of biology, botany and physiology is evolution.
There isn't a single licensed medical doctor in the United States that doesn't know this.
For anyone that goes to a real medical doctor and then says evolution is a "religion" I can only say they are a lousy hypocrite. They should be going to a faith healer like "Binny Hinn" or some other charlatan.
Just so people know, a charlatan is a person practising quackery or some similar confidence trick in order to obtain money or advantage via some form of pretence or deception. Faith healing success is statically equal to doing nothing at all.
- Email this page
By deanrddAugust 30, 2008 - 9:26pm